Typhoon Haiyan

After the typhoon – Earning own money again

  • 08.11.2016
  • Typhoon Haiyan

Interview with Caroline Schlaufer, economics expert COPRO International

In 2013, Typhoon Haiyan wreaked massive destruction in the Philippines. Besides homes, the livelihoods of many were destroyed, particularly in agriculture, fishing and on coconut plantations. This prompted Swiss Solidarity to fund projects to help the affected population generate new sources of income.

Caroline Schlaufer, economics expert on Swiss Solidarity’s international project commission, visited these projects in July and assessed how well they are working.

Ms Schlaufer, you travelled to the Philippines in July. What does the country look like today, and how much damage from Typhoon Haiyan is still visible?

Not much damage remains visible almost three years after the typhoon. Most homes and buildings have been rebuilt. Only the coconut trees felled by the storm have not yet been replanted in many places. But the typhoon is still very present in people’s minds.

Why is it so important to fund income-generation projects alongside reconstruction work?

People have to earn their money somehow. Most people in the Philippines are self-employed, mainly in agriculture or trade. The typhoon has not only devastated homes, but also the basis of livelihoods – for example cattle, a small store, market stall or the already mentioned coconut trees. It is important that those affected can earn their own income again as soon as possible. Unfortunately, these people have no insurance policies to fall back on. This is where these projects come into play.

Have the projects improved the lives of those affected?

In East Samar, the third largest island in the Philippines, for instance, many people earned their living from coconut cultivation before the typhoon. But when coconut trees are planted, it takes a few years until they yield fruit. Therefore one of the Swiss Solidarity-funded projects supports coconut farmers in diversifying their sources of income to include vegetable or cocoa cultivation. Great importance is attached to integrating farmers into the local and regional market, which helps them increase their income. Diversification should also offer people more protection from the negative impacts of future natural disasters.

Which projects have worked particularly well and why?

I think that the projects that make the most sense are those that are launched quickly after a disaster and focus on income generation. Unfortunately, many NGOs think about reconstruction first and income generation later. This means that those affected have to go into debt in order to resume paid work. Of the projects still involved in income generation more than one year after a disaster, the ones working particularly well are those which support and build on existing initiatives without trying to replace local services.

What hasn’t worked so well, and what lessons have been learned from this?

In my experience, the projects that do not work so well distribute goods or money a long time after the typhoon without demanding an own contribution from the beneficiaries. If no personal contribution is required, people often take up economic activities that are not sustainable. In the worst case, such projects can actually prevent self-initiative.

Has the aid effort in the Philippines been completed or what happens next?

A second phase is being funded for one very successful project I visited. The other projects have finished or will finish at the end of the year.

    Swiss Solidarity is a foundation, started as an initiative of the Swiss public media SRG SSR | Partnership & collaboration

    • Keystone
    • Swisscom
    • SRG SSR alt




    One picture often says more than a thousand words. Thanks to the partnership with the internationally operating Swiss picture agency Keystone, Swiss Solidarity has free and rapid access to recent pictures at any time. 

    The Keystone picture agency takes a Swiss view of our country and the world. A team of 20 full-time photographers throughout Switzerland as well as international partner agencies ensure that no current event is missed. As the largest picture agency in Switzerland, Keystone has an almost unending store of material on Swiss social history (around 11 million archive images).




    A national fundraising day is unthinkable without the means of Swisscom: In six regional fundraising centers, provided by Swisscom as well, between 120 and 150 phone lines are in use. This meant that, at the Tsunami’s fundraising day, over 70’000 calls were managed. On fundraising days, this service is free of charge.

    The internet as a means of communication is vital for Swiss Solidarity, too. Therefore, Swisscom supports Swiss Solidarity’s web presence year after year with a considerable contribution. Swisscom (formerly PTT) has been an abiding partner for Swiss Solidarity for over sixty years.


    SRG SSR alt

    Swiss Solidarity originated in 1946 from a radio show in western Switzerland – the first fundraising campaign was for the benefit of the orphans of World War II. The idea became more and more successful, and in 1983, Swiss Solidarity was granted the status of a foundation initiated by the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation SRG. Today, Swiss Solidarity is a foundation that raises funds for humanitarian relief projects and works with the SRG SSR.

    On national solidarity and fundraising days, Swiss Solidarity demonstrates just what is meant by «idée suisse»: The solidarity and support of Switzerland’s entire population. This is only possible because the SRG SSR idée suisse supports Swiss Solidarity with its free broadcastings. Swiss Solidarity itself is – with a few exceptions – not a relief organization, but rather a solidarity network, cooperating with 25 relief organizations.

    Additionally, the company’s entities SRF, RTS, RTR, RSI are all represented in the foundation board.